Keywords
feedback
self-assessment
peer assessment
technological tools
How to Cite
Abstract
The objective of the research was to analyze the publications made regarding formative assessment in a virtual context. The method that was applied was a qualitative approach, systematic review, the methodology of the PRISMA diagram was developed, the Scopus, EBSCO, ProQuest, OneFile and Eric databases were used to search for scientific articles through the use of Boolean equations of which 108 were initially selected, finally reduced to 40. The findings allowed us to identify that formative assessment in the context of virtuality is an important process that allows both teachers and students to make readjustments in the teaching-learning process and to make decisions to improve learning. quality formative feedback, positive attitude towards evaluation and appropriate use of technological tools, including them as great allies. Among the conclusions are that formative assessment involves the development of various strategies that allow student learning; as well as feedback that helps to identify progress and aspects of improvement in learning; from self-evaluation and peer evaluation, interaction and self-confidence are allowed in students and finally, the use of technological tools makes it easier to carry out formative assessment virtually.
References
Alharbi, A. S., Alhebshi, A. A., & Meccawy, Z. (2021). EFL Students' and Teachers' Perceptions of Google Forms as a Digital Formative Assessment Tool in Saudi Secondary Schools. Arab World English Journal, 7, 140–154. https://eds.a.ebscohost.com/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=23&sid=5c19e6e1-d3bf-4af4-93cb-4f4937f1f142%40sessionmgr4008
Andrade, M., Miller, R. M., & Ogden, M. (2020). Teamwork for Business Majors – The Impact of Peer Evaluation. E-Journal of Business Education & Scholarship of Teaching, 14(2), 1–18. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eue&AN=146878237&site=bsi-live
Arif, N., Zia, Q., & Sadiq, T. (2021). Effect of Paired Formative Assessment on Students' Learning. Pafmj, 71(3), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v71i3.3671
Ayalon, M., & Wilkie, K. J. (2021). Investigating peer-assessment strategies for mathematics pre-service teacher learning on formative assessment. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 24(4), 399–426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-020-09465-1
Bashitialshaaer, R., Alhendawi, M., & Avery, H. (2021). Obstacles to applying electronic exams amidst the COVID-19 pandemic: An exploratory study in the Palestinian universities in Gaza. Information (Switzerland), 12(6), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.3390/info12060256
Basurto-M endoza, S. T., Moreira-Cedeño, J. A., Velásquez-Espinales, A. N., & Rodríguez-Gámez, M. (2021). Self-Assessment, Co-Assessment and Hetero-Assessment as an innovative approach in pedagogical practice andits effect on the teaching-learning process. Pole of Knowledge, 6(3), 828–845. https://doi.org/10.23857/pc.v6i3.2408
Bedford, S. B., Bissoonauth, A., James, K., & Stace, R. (2020). Developing a peer supported feedback model that enhances oral proficiency in french. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 17(5), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.53761/1.17.5.13
Bores-García, D., Hortigüela-Alcalá, D., Hernando-Garijo, A., & González-Calvo, G. (2020). Analysis of student motivation towards body expression through the use of formative and share assessment. Challenges, 2041(40), 198–208. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v1i40.83025
Calderon, K. M. (2021). Formative assessment in the competency-based approach. Revista Latinoamericana Ogmios, 1(2), 2–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
Casanova, D., Alsop, G., & Huet, I. (2021). Giving away some of their powers! Towards learner agency in digital assessment and feedback. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 16(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-021-00168-6
Çekiç, A., & Bakla, A. (2021). A Review of Digital Formative Assessment Tools: Features and future directions. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching, 8(3), 1459–1486. https://eds.a.ebscohost.com/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=24&sid=5c19e6e1-d3bf-4af4-93cb-4f4937f1f142%40sessionmgr4008
Çetin, Z. (2021). Using Digital Formative Assessment to Evaluate EFL Learners' English-Speaking Skills. GIST – Education and Learning Research Journal, 22(22), 103–123. https://doi.org/10.26817/16925777.1001
Choi, Y., & Mcclenen, C. (2020). Development of Adaptive Formative Assessment System Using Computerized Adaptive Testing and Dynamic Bayesian Networks. https://www.proquest.com/docview/2463794201/fulltextPDF/EDA0137CC0284D22PQ/32?accountid=37408
Chorrojprasert, L. (2021). Learners' perceptions on peer assessment in team-based learning classroom. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 14(1), 522–545. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1284501.pdf
Cobbold, C., & Wright, L. (2021). Use of Formative Feedback to Enhance Summative Performance. Anatolian Journal of Education, 6(1), 109–116. https://doi.org/10.29333/aje.2021.619a
Cunill, M., & Curbelo, A. (2021). An approach to the self-regulation of learning from formative assessment in medical education. Higher Medical Education, 35(1), 1–20. https://eds.b.ebscohost.com/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=13&sid=205f7206-0fd6-41a6-b4e0-f2dcacc73e31%40sessionmgr103
Cutting, C., & Larkin, K. (2021). The Impact of Weekly Formative Video Feedback on Pre- Service Teachers' Experiences in Online Mathematics Education. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 23(1), 74–90. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1295257.pdf
Del Pozo, A. (2020). Raising awareness on assessment criteria through peer-assessment and self-reflection in the Spanish oral class. Five Years of ELEUK Conferences: A Selection of Short Papers from 2019, 79–88. https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2020.41.1077
Diaz, M. M. (2018). Impact of Formative Feedback and Assessment on Bioscience Teaching-Learning. Higher Medical Education, 32(3), 147–157.
Diez-Gutiérrez, E. J., & Gajardo, K. (2021). Online assessment in higher education during Spanish confinement by COVID-19: The view of students. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 18(5), 01–20. https://eds.a.ebscohost.com/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=6&sid=5c19e6e1-d3bf-4af4-93cb-4f4937f1f142%40sessionmgr4008
Ehren, M. C. M., Madrid, R., Romiti, S., Armstrong, P. W., Fisher, P., & McWhorter, D. L. (2021). Teaching in the COVID-19 era: Understanding the opportunities and barriers for teacher agency. Perspectives in Education, 39(1), 61–76. https://doi.org/10.18820/2519593X/pie.v39.i1.5
Espasa-Roca, A., & Guasch-Pascual, T. (2021). How to engage students to use online feedback? ITEN Ibero-American Journal of Distance Education, 24(2), 127. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.24.2.29107
Ferretti, F., Santi, G. R. P., Del Zozzo, A., Garzetti, M., & Bolondi, G. (2021). Assessment practices and beliefs: Teachers' perspectives on assessment during long distance learning. Education Sciences, 11(6), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11060264
García-Alberti, M., Suárez, F., Chiyón, I., & Mosquera, J. C. (2021). Challenges and Experiences of Online Evaluation in Courses of Civil Engineering during the Lockdown Learning Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic. Education Sciences. https://www.proquest.com/docview/2487230896/fulltextPDF/EDA0137CC0284D22PQ/11?accountid=37408
Garcia, L. (2021). Can we rely on assessment in distance and digital education systems? Ibero-American Journal of Distance Education, 24(2), 9–29. https://eds.a.ebscohost.com/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=9&sid=5c19e6e1-d3bf-4af4-93cb-4f4937f1f142%40sessionmgr4008
Gezer, T., Wang, C., Polly, A., Martin, C., Pugalee, D., & Lambert, R. (2021). The relationship between formative assessment and summative assessment in primary grade mathematics classrooms. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 13(5), 673–685. https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2021.220
González, D. H., López-pastor, V. M., & Manrique, J. C. (2020). Formative and Shared Assessment in Contexts of Cooperative Learning in Physical Education in Primary. Culture, Science and Sport, 15(44), 213–223. https://eds.b.ebscohost.com/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=13&sid=205f7206-0fd6-41a6-b4e0-f2dcacc73e31%40sessionmgr103
Grier, D., Lindt, S. F., & Miller, S. C. (2021). Formative Assessment with Game-based Technology. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science, 5(2), 193–202. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijtes.97
Gros, B., & Cano, E. (2021). Feedback processes to promote self-regulation with technological support in higher education: Systematic review. ITEN Ibero-American Journal of Distance Education, 24(2), 107. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.24.2.28886
Haughney, K., Wakeman, S., & Hart, L. (2020). education sciences Quality of Feedback in Higher Education: A Review of Literature. Education Sciences, 10(60), 2–15. https://go.gale.com/ps/retrieve.do?tabID=T002&resultListType=RESULT_LIST&searchResultsType=SingleTab&hitCount=2451&searchType=BasicSearchForm¤tPosition=6&docId=GALE%7CA643644418&docType=Report&sort=Relevance&contentSegment=ZONE-MOD1&prodId=AONE&page
Hidalgo, M. E. (2021). Reflections on formative assessment in the university context. International Journal of Pedagogy and Educational Innovation, 1(1), 189–210. https://editic.net/ripie/index.php/ripie/article/view/32
Huertas-Abril, C. A., Palacios-Hidalgo, F. J., & Gómez-Parra, M. E. (2021). Peer assessment as a tool to enhance pre-service primary bilingual teachers' training. ITEN Ibero-American Journal of Distance Education, 24(2), 149–168. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.24.2.28788
Jaam, M., Nazar, Z., Rainkie, D. C., Hassan, D. A., Hussain, F. N., Kassab, S. E., & Agouni, A. (2021). Using assessment design decision framework in understanding the impact of rapid transition to remote education on student assessment in health-related colleges: A qualitative study. Plos One, 16(7), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254444
Jeong, J. S., Gonzalez-Gomez, D., & Prieto, F. Y. (2020). Sustainable and flipped stem education: Formative assessment online interface for observing pre-service teachers' performance and motivation. Education Sciences, 10(10), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10100283
Kanjee, A. (2020). Exploring primary school teachers' use of formativassessment across fee and no-fee schools. South African Journal of Childhood Education, 10(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajce.v10i1.824
Kusairi, S. (2020). A web-based formative feedback system development by utilizing isomorphic multiple choice items to support physics teaching and learning. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 10(1), 117–126. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.781
Major, P. E., Malang, K., Sciences, N., Malang, N., Sciences, N., & Surabaya, N. (2020). Developing Formative e-Assessment as a Stimulus to Improve the Quality of Mathematical Methods for Physics Learning Process. Journal of Physics, 1491, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1491/1/012068
Milawati, M., Saukah, A., Suharmanto, S., & Suryati, N. (2021). Characterizing Indonesian EFL Teachers' Questioning as Informal Formative Assessment Strategy. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 11(3), 112–124. https://doi.org/10.14527/pegegog.2021.00
Molinero, M. del C., & Chávez, U. (2019). Technological tools in the teaching-learning process in higher education students. Ibero-American Journal for Educational Research and Development, 10(19), 1–31. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=7926891
Moreno, T. (2021). Feedback (1st ed.). http://ilitia.cua.uam.mx:8080/jspui/bitstream/123456789/958/1/La feedback.pdf
Muñiz-López, H. S., Uresti-Marín, R. M., & Castañón-Rodríguez, J. F. (2021). Use of information and communication technologies as a strategy to reduce fruit and vegetable waste. ScienceUAT, 16(1), 178–195. https://doi.org/10.29059/cienciauat.v16i1.1528
Nikolaeva, S., & Korol, T. (2021). Formative assessment in the translation classroom: Closing a feedback loop. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(2), 738–746. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i2.21274
Novôa, R., & Nasser, L. (2021). Um Estudo sobre o Feedback Formativo na Avaliação em Matemática e sua Conexão com a Atribuição de Notas. Bolema, 35(69), 1–21. https://www.proquest.com/docview/2524910965/fulltextPDF/D06F855D9B574519PQ/9?accountid=37408
Pessoa, K., & Dalto, J. O. (2020). Notebook of mathematical modeling activities as a formative assessment instrument. Educação Matematica Pesquisa, 22(1), 371–393. https://www.proquest.com/docview/2351474683/fulltextPDF/2DA9B2A239CE4CDFPQ/1?accountid=37408
Rahman, K. A., Hasan, K., & Namaziandost, E. (2021). Implementing a formative assessment model at the secondary schools: attitudes and challenges. Lang Test Asia, 11(18), 1–18. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40468-021-00136-3
RR, S., Fox-Turnbull, W., Earl-Rinehart, K., & Calder, N. (2020). Development of formative assessment tool for a primary, technology classroom. Design & Technology Education: An International Journal, 25(2), 101–116. https://ojs.lboro.ac.uk/DATE/article/view/2763
Sa'di, R. A., Abdelraziq, A., & Sharadgah, T. A. (2021). E-Assessment at Jordan's Universities in the Time of the Covid-19 Lockdown: Challenges and Solutions. Arab World English Journal, 1, 37–54. https://eds.a.ebscohost.com/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=26&sid=5c19e6e1-d3bf-4af4-93cb-4f4937f1f142%40sessionmgr400
Silvis-Cividjian, N., Went, M., Jansma, R., Bonev, V., & Apostolov, E. (2021). Good Bug Hunting: Inspiring and Motivating Software Testing Novices. Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, ITiCSE, 1, 171–177. https://doi.org/10.1145/3430665.3456330
Suyo-Vega, J. A., Poland, A. da C., & Miotto, A. I. (2021). Revisión Sistemática Sobre Aprendizaje Autónomo Universitario a Través De La Virtualidad Systematic Review on University Autonomous Learning Through Virtuality. ICT Development Notebooks, 10(2), 17–47. https://eds.b.ebscohost.com/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=12&sid=6eb19112-624c-453e-bc8c-92310c9bc96a%40pdc-v-sessmgr03
Urrutia, G., & Bonfill, X. (2010). PRISMA_Spanish.pdf. Clinical Medicine, 135(11), 507–511.
Ustabulut, M. Y. (2021). The Self-Assessment of Lecturers Teaching Turkish as a Foreign Language Regarding Distance Education in the Covid-19 Pandemic Era. International Journal of Progressive Education, 17(4), 212–221. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2021.366.13
Viñoles-Cosentino, V., Esteve-mon, F. M., Llopis-Nebot, M. Á., & Adell-Segura, J. (2021). Validation of a formative assessment platform for teachers' digital competence in times of Covid-19. Ibero-American Journal of Distance Education, 24(2), 87–106. https://eds.b.ebscohost.com/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=11&sid=205f7206-0fd6-41a6-b4e0-f2dcacc73e31%40sessionmgr103
Wafubwa, R. N., & Csíkos, C. (2020). Formative Assessment as a Predictor of Mathematics Teachers' Levels of Metacognitive Regulation. International Journal of Instruction, 14(1), 983–998. https://doi.org/10.29333/IJI.2021.14158A
Wqfubwa, R. N. (2020). Role of Formative Assessment in Improving Students' Motivation, Engagement, and Achievement: A Systematic Review of Literature. International Journal of Assessment and Evaluation, 28(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-7920/CGP/V28I01/17-31
Xiang, X., Yum, S., & Lian, R. (2020). Teachers' self-efficacy and formative assessment of students: Moderating role of school goal structure. Social Behavior and Personality, 48(6), 1–13. https://www.proquest.com/docview/2457328725/fulltextPDF/2DA9B2A239CE4CDFPQ/20?accountid=37408
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2024 Nancy Edith Rivera Huaranga, Mildred Jénica Ledesma Cuadros