In Alpha Centauri Scientific and Technological Research Journal all contributions that are selected for peer review are sent to at least one, but usually two or more, independent reviewers, selected by the editors. Authors can suggest suitable independent reviewers and can also request that the journal exclude one or two people or laboratories. The magazine sympathizes with such requests and generally accepts them, but the editor's decision on the choice of arbitrators is final.

Editors, authors and reviewers must keep all details of the editorial and peer review process of submitted manuscripts confidential. Unless otherwise stated as part of the open peer review, the peer review process is confidential and conducted anonymously; the identities of the reviewers are not disclosed. Reviewers must maintain the confidentiality of manuscripts. If a reviewer wishes to seek the advice of their colleagues while evaluating a manuscript, the reviewer should consult with the editor and should ensure that confidentiality is maintained and that the names of such colleagues are provided to the journal with the final report. Regardless of whether a submitted manuscript is eventually published, journal correspondence, referees' reports, and other confidential material should not be published. disclosed or otherwise advertised without prior written consent. Reviewers should be aware that it is our policy to keep their names confidential and that we make every effort to ensure this confidentiality. However, we cannot guarantee that this confidentiality will be maintained in the event of a successful legal action to reveal identity.

Alpha Centauri reserves the right to contact sponsors, regulatory bodies, journals and the authors' institutions in cases of suspected misconduct in research or publication.